TMI Blog2016 (2) TMI 934X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion u/s 143(1) of the Act was issued on the return of income filed by the assessee. A Search and seizure operation was carried out u/s 132 of the Act on 23.11.2007 in the case of the assessee. The assessee is engaged in mining of iron ore, manufacturing of sponge iron and trading in liquor. Pursuant to the search, an order of assessment u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act was passed on 31.12.2009. In the said order AO made an addition of ₹ 4,30,00,000/-. The addition was made on the basis of the seized documents marked as TPS-9 at pages 3,4,15 and 16 found in the course of search. The documents seized evidenced the assessee having received a sum of ₹ 4,20,97,077/.- from Sree Metalik Ltd. It was stated that the said sum was received for supply of materials to the party and was not recorded in the regular books of account of the assessee. The assessee offered to tax income of ₹ 4,30,00,000/- on the basis of the seized documents. The said sum was declared in the return of income filed in response to the notice u/s 153A of the Act. The same was brought to tax by the AO. The disclosure in the return of income was made pursuant to disclosure made in the statement u/s 132( ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Vs. Manjunatha Cotton Ginning Factory (2013) 218 Taxman 423 (Kar.) wherein it was held that if the show cause notice u/s.274 of the Act does not specify as to the exact charge viz., whether the charge is that the Assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed particulars of income by striking out the irrelevant portion of printed show cause notice, than the imposition of penalty on the basis of such invalid show cause notice cannot be sustained. 6. None appeared on behalf of the Revenue. We proceeded to decide the appeal after hearing the submissions of the learned AR. 7. We have considered the submissions of the learned AR. The argument of the learned counsel for the Assessee was that the show cause notice u/s.274 of the Act which is in a printed form and the AO has indicated in the said notice as to whether the penalty is sought to be levied on the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing particulars of such income by striking off the irrelevant portion of the printed show cause notice. On this aspect we find that in the show cause notice u/s.274 of the Act the AO has not struck out the irrelevant part. It is th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as such he is not liable to pay penalty. The practice of the Department sending a printed farm where all the ground mentioned in Section 271 are mentioned would not satisfy requirement of law when the consequences of the assessee not rebutting the initial presumption is serious in nature and he had to pay penalty from 100% to 300% of the tax liability. As the said provisions have to be held to be strictly construed, notice issued under Section 274 should satisfy the grounds which he has to meet specifically. Otherwise, principles of natural justice is offended if the show cause notice is vague. On the basis of such proceedings, no penalty could be imposed on the assessee. 60. Clause (c) deals with two specific offences, that is to say, concealing particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. No doubt, the facts of some cases may attract both the offences and in some cases there may be overlapping of the two offences but in such cases the initiation of the penalty proceedings also must be for both the offences. But drawing up penalty proceedings for one offence and finding the assessee guilty of another offence or finding him guilty for either the one or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nalty has to be clear as to the limb for which it is levied and the position being unclear penalty is not sustainable. Therefore, when the Assessing Officer proposes to invoke the first limb being concealment, then the notice has to be appropriately marked. Similar is the case for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The standard proforma without striking of the relevant clauses will lead to an inference as to non-application of mind. The final conclusion of the Hon ble Court was as follows:- 63. In the light of what is stated above, what emerges is as under: a) Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is a civil liability. b) Mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for breach of civil obligations or liabilities. c) Willful concealment is not an essential ingredient for attracting civil liability. d) Existence of conditions stipulated in Section 271(1)(c) is a sine qua non for initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271. e) The existence of such conditions should be discernible from the Assessment Order or order of the Appellate Authority or Revisional Authority. f) Even if there is no specific finding regarding the existence of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rect particulars of income q) Sending printed form where all the ground mentioned in Section 271 are mentioned would not satisfy requirement of law. r) The assessee should know the grounds which he has to meet specifically. Otherwise, principles of natural justice is offended. On the basis of such proceedings, no penalty could be imposed to the assessee. s) Taking up of penalty proceedings on one limb and finding the assessee guilty of another limb is bad in law. t) The penalty proceedings are distinct from the assessment proceedings. The proceedings for imposition of penalty though emanate from proceedings of assessment, it is independent and separate aspect of the proceedings. u) The findings recorded in the assessment proceedings in so far as concealment of income and furnishing of incorrect particulars would not operate as res judicata in the penalty proceedings. It is open to the assessee to contest the said proceedings on merits. However, the validity of the assessment or reassessment in pursuance of which penalty is levied, cannot be the subject matter of penalty proceedings. The assessment or reassessment cannot be declared as invalid in the penalty pr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|