TMI Blog1980 (2) TMI 268X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judgment of the Courts below dismissing the plaintiff's suit for recovery of ₹ 6,800/-. The facts of the case lie within a very narrow compass and have been detailed in the judgment of the Courts below. It appears that Manak Chand was the owner of a lorry No. AJM 455 and has also the route permit in his name. On 17th February, 1956 Manak Chand sold the route permit and the lorry of Lalch ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o Lalchand and Tarachand for taking steps for transferring the registration in his name in view of the purchase of the lorry by him. Despite these notices, no action was taken. Hence the plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of the amount of ₹ 5,000/- which was paid by the plaintiff for the purchase of lorry from Lal Chand and Tara Chand defendants and claimed ₹ 1,800/- as interest on th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ides and shall forward the certificate of registration to that registering authority together with the prescribed fee in order that particulars of the transfer of ownership may be entered therein. (2) A registering authority other than the original registering authority making any such entry shall communicate the transfer of ownership to the original registering authority. Under the provisio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
