Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1971 (3) TMI 38

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hore were quite diverse and distinct and there was no interconnection, interlacing or interdependence between the two businesses - Since the businesses were held to be separate and there was no interconnection, the interest paid on liability of the other business which was transferred to the second business could not be claimed as a deduction - - - - - Dated:- 15-3-1971 - Judge(s) : H. N. SETH. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 9-50 the assessee claimed a deduction on account of interest paid in respect of these liabilities. The claim was disallowed by the Income-tax Officer on the ground that the liabilities related to the defunct business in Pakistan. He estimated the interest at Rs. 40,000 and added that amount to the profits. Similarly, for the assessment year 1951-52, he disallowed the claim to deduction of interest .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the flour mill at Lahore was a separate business from the sugar mill at Barabanki. It has specifically held that the activities at Barabanki and Lahore were quite diverse and distinct and there was no interconnection, interlacing or interdependence between the two businesses. Learned counsel for the assessee has referred us to the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Prit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nding is erroneous in law, we must take it as the basis for deciding the question referred. It seems to us that there can be no dispute that upon that finding the question referred must be answered in the negative. The question is answered in the negative in favour of the Commissioner of Income-tax and against the assessee. The Commissioner is entitled to his costs which we assess at Rs. 200. Co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates