TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 1634X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of 10 working days from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. For this purpose an appropriate date be fixed on the petitioner-Company’s application for early listing of the pending before the ITAT. Further in view of the petitioner’s case that the issue before the ITAT is fully covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Jaipur vs. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5.2017 whereby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, at Jaipur (hereinafter ITAT ) rejected its application to extend the stay order in the appeal filed under Section 210 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) III Jaipur s order dated 09.12.2014 in respect of a demand relating to Assessment Year 2012-13. It has been submitted that the issue pending ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tioner-Company should seek disposal of its appeal pending before the ITAT, if so advised, in terms of the judgment of the D.B. of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Jaipur vs. M/s. Bharti Hexacom Limited. (supra). instead of invoking this Court s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Heard. Considered. I am of the view that in the facts of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
