TMI Blog2018 (5) TMI 267X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he penalty - Reassessing the quantum would result into re-appreciation of the evidences and review of the order, which is not vested with the Tribunal - ROM application dismissed. - C/1337/2005-DB - M/10022/2018 - Dated:- 5-2-2018 - DR, D.M. MISRA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND MR. RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For Appellant: Mr. Amal Paresh Dave (Advocate) For Respondent: Mr. A. Mishra (AR.) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er not been vested with the Tribunal in view of the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Belapur, Mumbai vs RDC Concrete (India) P. Ltd. 2011 (270) ELT 625 (SC). 4. We find force in the contention of the Ld. Advocate for the Revenue inasmuch as after analyzing the evidences placed on record and the role played by the appellant this Tribunal has arrived at the quantum of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|