2015 (11) TMI 1791

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arks No person by this name at this address. So, returned for the correct address. The defect memo issued to the assessee that Tribunal fee is paid short by ₹ 3,768/- has not been rectified. Thus, dismiss this appeal as not admitted by applying the ratio of the decision of the Tribunal in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd, [ 1991 (5) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-D ] as held .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed post has been returned by the Postal Authorities with the remarks No person by this name at this address. So, returned for the correct address. The defect memo issued to the assessee that Tribunal fee is paid short by ₹ 3,768/- has not been rectified. Thus, I dismiss this appeal as not admitted by applying the ratio of the decision of the Tribunal in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X