Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (12) TMI 662

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CIT (A) has taken a reasonable view in estimating the expenditure at 15% - No error or illegality in the order of the ld. CIT (A) in estimating the expenditure @ 15% of the gross agricultural income. - ITA No. 869/JP/2019 (Assessment Year: 2015-16.) - - - Dated:- 1-11-2019 - SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessee by: Shri S.L. Poddar (Advocate) Revenue by: Shri Abhishek Sharma (Addl.CIT) ORDER PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22-05-2019 of ld. CIT (Appeals)-2, Jaipur for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :- 1. Unde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3. I have considered the rival submissions as well as the relevant material on record. At the outset, it is noted that the issue involved in the assessee s appeal is identical as in the case of sister concern in case of M/s. Gullu Mal Gulachi Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO in ITA No. 868/JP/2019 vide even date order this issue has been considered by me as under :- 5. I have considered the rival submissions as well as the relevant material on record. Though the AO while computing the agricultural income has taken incorrect figures and thereby made the addition of ₹ 8,37,900/-, however, the ld. CIT (A) while allowing the part relief has taken the correct amount of agricultural income and expenditure. Therefore, th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion of agriculture crops could not fetch the price as declared by the assessee. Accordingly, Assessing Officer estimated agricultural income at ₹ 24,35,099/- and made addition of remaining amount of ₹ 8,37,900/- as undisclosed income. 2.3.1. Before me, Authorized Representative stated that sales bills were submitted and not doubted by Assessing Officer. Sales of other sources should be accepted. 2.3.2. Regarding expenses, Authorized Representative said deduction of 30% based on decision of Shri Durga Prasad Yadav is misplaced. Assessee has given land for cultivation on sharing basis. 2.3.3. On perusal of overall facts, it is seen that the Assessing Officer has not doubted the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates