TMI Blog1892 (5) TMI 1X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... That application for some cause or other was struck off. The decree-holder then died, and on the 26th November 1889 his legal representative made a second application, which appears to have been struck off or rejected on the 15th February 1890. The present application was filed in the following month, March 1890. 2. The first Court held that, inasmuch as the second application of the 26th Nove ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ken before us, the first being that the application of the 26th November 1889 was itself barred, as having been made more than three years subsequent to the first application of the 13th July 1886. 5. This point does not appear to have been argued, if indeed it was taken, in either of the lower Courts; and as its decision would depend upon facts and circumstances which are not before us, we do ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
