TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 1695X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SLP and confirmed the order passed by the Gujarat High Court [ 2008 (3) TMI 323 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ] and other decisions of the High Court of Gujarat in the case of Sanjay Oilcake Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [ 2008 (3) TMI 323 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ] and N.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Dy. C.I.T., [ 2016 (6) TMI 1139 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ] the parties are bound by the principle of law pro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... her in the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was justified in holding that the purchases made by the assessee were genuine and the Assessing Officer was not justified in making the addition u/s 69C and its proviso? 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Considering the law declared by the Supreme Court in the case of Vijay Proteins Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Spec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|