TMI Blog2022 (2) TMI 1306X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rposes of maintaining its appeal, the petitioner was required to deposit 10% of the disputed tax amount and not 10% of the total disputed amount as has been directed by the Appeal Authority. Also there is no dispute that the petitioner had deposited 10% of the disputed tax amount (involved in the appeal) arising from the original order dated 22.11.2017 passed by the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... after referred to as the 'Act, 2017'). 3. Thus, for the purposes of maintaining its appeal, the petitioner was required to deposit 10% of the disputed tax amount and not 10% of the total disputed amount as has been directed by the Appeal Authority. Also there is no dispute that the petitioner had deposited 10% of the disputed tax amount (involved in the appeal) arising from the original ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
