Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (9) TMI 420

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ds imported under previous Bill of Entry sold by the appellant are doing manufacturing activity. However in present import, the benefit is denied to appellant on the ground that appellant failed to submit documentary evidence to prove that goods imported under present Bill of Entry is meant for sale to industrial consumers and for that reason they are not eligible for exemption under Rule 3B of the ibid Rules. The above finding is factually unsustainable. The importer had produced sufficient evidence regarding details of the clients to whom the goods are sold after its import earlier and once the Adjudication Authority is satisfied with the activity carried out by the importer, no further evidence can be produced at the time of import regar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rement under Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, goods were detained. Appellants vide letter dated 01.11.2022 submitted that the goods are not meant for retail sale and not falling under the category of goods as alleged. The goods are sold to industrial users after doing processing like cutting, shaping according to the requirement of the buyers. Moreover present package is only for the purpose of transportation. Further the appellant also produced GST invoice related to past import along with MSME and GST registration. However, the Adjudication Authority ordered absolute confiscation of the goods and also imposed penalty of Rs.2 lakhs under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962. In appeal, first Appellate Authority also upheld t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... are subject to provisions of Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules 2011 as alleged, if the appellant fulfil the condition regarding affixing of label showing not for retail sale it is sufficient to meet the conditions under ibid Rules. The learned Counsel also drew our attention to Bill of Entry dated 20.09.2022 and Bill of Entry dated 10.11.2022 where same goods were imported through very same port and no such objection was made at any point of time. Regarding absolute confiscation, learned Counsel drew our attention to the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of O. Konavalov V/s Commander, Coast Guard Region reported in 2006 (197) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.). Relevant paragraph of the order is reproduced below for ready referen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nstitutional consumers and the provisions are applicable only when imported goods are meant for resale. As per Section 2 (bb) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 institutional consumer means the consumer who buys packaged commodities directly from the manufacturer or from an importer or wholesale dealer for use by that industry and the package shall have declaration not for retail sale , The Adjudication Authority admits that since goods are meant for industrial consumers, it is exempted from the provisions of the ibid Rules. The Adjudication Authority also admits that the clients to whom the goods imported under previous Bill of Entry sold by the appellant are doing manufacturing activity. However in present impor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... visions of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 are empowered to act upon the sale of goods without proper packaging if it is sold without complying with the statutory requirement. 6. Considering the above facts, impugned orders are set aside. The respondent shall allow the appellant to affix not for retail sale labels on each packet and after confirming the same, shall allow clearance of the goods. Regarding the prayer of the appellant for detention certificate, the issue is not considered by the Adjudication/Appellate Authority. However considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, respondent is directed to consider the request made by the appellant vide letter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates