TMI Blog1987 (11) TMI 404X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he parties. The respondent State had challenged the order before the Court of Sessions when the learned Magistrate before whom the matter was proceeding directed release of the truck in favour of the appellant. The Revisional Court dismissed the petition of the State. A second Revision did not lie at the instance of the State to the High Court in view of the provisions of Section 397(3) of Cr.P.C. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Merely by saying that the jurisdiction of the High Court for exercise of its inherent power was being invoked the statutory bar could not have been overcome. If that was to be permitted every revision application facing the bar of Section 397(3) of the Code could be labelled as one under Section 482. We are satisfied that this is a case where the High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
