2002 (2) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the respondent. ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Jarnail Singh, respondent No. 2 executed two documents of sale (exhibits P-2 and D-1) on November 25, 1991. Having regard to the findings of the courts below that exhibit P-2 was executed earlier than exhibit D-1 and having noted that exhibit P-2 in favour of the first respondent was executed at 10.00 a.m. and it was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... revail over the other executed subsequently. In view of the concurrent findings, referred to above, the High Court has rightly held that exhibit P-2 prevails over exhibit D-1. We find no illegality in the order of the High Court warranting our interference under article 136 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - Income .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X