TMI Blog1991 (4) TMI 132X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... order dated 25-8-1989, the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore, states that the petitioner had erroneously availed of the benefit of Notification No. 208 of 1983 and after giving a show cause notice, he came to the conclusion that the petitioner is liable to pay a sum of Rs. 2,92,201.57 and a penalty of Rs. 2,000/-. The petitioner had filed an appeal before the second respondent-Tri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r dated 7-3-1991, reference is made to the offer of the counsel before the Tribunal to make pre-deposit of Rs. 1,00,000/-. In fact, it is stated that the Bench accepts the offer and directs payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- on or before 24-6-1991, as a condition for waiving the pre-deposit of the balance amount. They have also held that the petitioner has no prima facie case and they have looked into the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the following terms: The petitioner is given liberty to move the second respondent-Tribunal seeking modification of the order dated 7-3-1991 and seeking extension for payment of the amount. Having regard to the claim made, if proper reasons are given, the Tribunal will look into the matter and try to redress the hardship, if any, suffered by the petitioner. There will be no order as to costs. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
