Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (12) TMI 70

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ufacture of the bottles, shall print a logo of the customer on the bottles. The petitioners were required by Messrs. Poona Beverages Limited to supply 200 ml. Campa bottles to enable the beverage company to sell beverages in the said bottles. The petitioners filed price list No. 37 dated April 4,1978 for supply of Campa bottles inclusive of the printing charges. The price list sets out that the manufacturing cost would be Rs. 700/- and printing charges Rs. 200/- and consequently the total charges Rs. 900/- per 1000 bottles. The petitioners also informed the Superintendent of Central Excise that the printing charges should not be included in the assessable value while determining the duty payable by the petitioners. The Assistant Collector a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ting. The order of the Collector is under challenge. 4. Mr. Hidaytullah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submitted that the Collector misdirected himself while exercising powers of review under Section 35A(2) and the conclusion that the cost of the printing shall be included while determining the assessable value of the glass bottles under Tariff Item No. 23A(4) is erroneous. The learned counsel urged that the Collector declined to address to the issue which requires to be determined for ascertaining the assessable value. The petitioners had claimed before the Collector that the process of manufacture of glass bottles is complete and the taxable event occurs before the work of printing logo is undertaken. The Colle .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Department, could not dispute that by process of printing logo on these bottles the identity of the bottles is not changed. Mr. Desai submitted that value of the bottle stands increased by process of printing. But it is not possible to accede to the submission on the facts and circumstances of the case. The process of printing logo is undertakes for the purpose of identification and we are unable to appreciate how by any stretch of imagination it will increase the value of the bottle. Indeed, every manufacturer undertakes the process of either printing logo or the name of the customer when an order is booked for a large number of articles to be manufactured. For illustration, several companies distribu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rticle does not depend upon the printing of the logo of the customer. As mentioned hereinabove, the bottles could easily be sold in market and the logo is printed only for the purpose of identity of the customer. Mr. Desai also referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in Empire Industries Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others - 1985 (20) E.L.T. 179. The decision of the Supreme Court has no relevance to the facts of the present case because in the case before the Supreme Court the identity of the article was entirely changed and a new article had come into existence after the process of bleaching, dyeing and printing was undertaken. The process of bleaching, dyeing and printing was carried out on grey fabrics to bring into existe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ever about the facts on which the decision is to be resisted. In these circumstances, we decline to accede to the preliminary objection raised by Mr. Desai. 8. Accordingly, petition succeeds and the impugned order dated July 7,1983 passed by Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune, and a copy of which is annexed as Exhibit A' to the petition, is set aside. We wish to make it clear that we are not expressing any opinion about the claim rejected by the Assistant Collector by order dated October 3l, 1981 as appeal filed by the petitioners against the refusal of part of the claim of refund .is still pending. In the circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. The bond executed by the petitioners in accordance with th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates