TMI Blog2006 (12) TMI 148X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ise Act, 1944 against the order, bearing No. 640/2000/B, dated 3-5-2000, passed by CEGAT. 2.By this application the Revenue has sought calling for the reference from the Tribunal on the following question of law which according to the applicant arises out of me impugned order passed by the Tribunal in this case. The questions proposed are as follows :- "The duty not levied can be said to be r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Customs Act, 1962" 3.Heard Shri V.K. Zelawat, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India for the petitioner. 4.Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused record of the case, we are of the opinion that this application deserves to be allowed by directing the Tribunal to send statement of case as according to us the question proposed supra are referable questions of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y this court; as to whether questions proposed by the applicant do arise out of the impugned order of Tribunal and whether they are referable questions of law or not for their answer on merits by this court in our reference. Once, therefore, we record this finding the questions of law can be .called. As observed supra, in this case, we are so satisfied. 6.Accordingly and in view of the aforesaid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fit of concessional rate of duty to assessee on the strength of two exemption notifications, referred in question no. 1? 4. When the imported components were not used in manufacture of LCV by the assessee but were diverted for meeting the spare part requirements for vehicles under warrants scheme, whether respondent (assessee) was eligible to claim the benefit of aforementioned 2 notifications i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
