Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (9) TMI 206

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e dispute is confined to payment of duty on molasses only. Molasses is subject to dual control. Central Excise Authorities have controlled over molasses as Central Excise Duty is levied and collected on molasses. State Excise Authorities exercised control over molasses as its allotment is restricted and controlled in terms of the State Excise laws. Molasses cannot be removed from the manufacturing factory without a certificate issued by the State Excise Authorities. 3. Central Excise Authorities did stock taking in the year 1998 on budget day which was on 1st of June' 98. The assessee applied for remission of duty stating that there was a loss of molasses on account of natural causes amounting to 546.507 M.Ts. The Departmental authorities .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that it was based on actually dip method which was not the scientific method of calculating the molasses at any time. The assessee, therefore, claimed that the total loss of 5465.07 qntls. of molasses which comes to 1.70% of the total quantity stored in the tanks should be condoned for purpose of remission of duty under Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Commissioner held as indicated above. 4. Arguing the case for the appellants Shri Gopal Prasad and Shri S.N. Srivastava, ld. Counsels submit that the stock of molasses taken by the authorities for determining the loss in storage was wrong inasmuch as on the budget day, there was no physical verification of the stock by actual weighment. They submitted that there is no scienti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y then the loss is very high. Ld. DR referring to the order of the ld. Commissioner submits that the ld. Commissioner examined the budget day declaration filed by the assessee wherein it was not disclosed or indicated that the quantity of 47590.47 qntls. of molasses was inclusive of losses. Ld. DR, therefore, submits that there was nothing wrong in accepting the figure of budget day as the actual stock available with the assessee and since the loss was found abnormally high the authorities have rightly refused to condone that loss and confirmed the demand and imposed the penalty. 6. I have heard the contentions of both the sides. I have also perused the evidence on record. I have also perused the case law cited by the Counsel of the appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates