TMI Blog2005 (3) TMI 313X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y Modi Xerox Financial Services Ltd., is whether Modvat credit of the duty paid on inputs is available to them on the basis of invoices which are not complete in all respects. 2. Shri B.L. Narasimhan, learned Advocate, submitted that the appellants manufacture developers and availed benefit of Modvat credit; that they received two consignments of coated carrier from M/s. Modi Xerox Ltd. under in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h NT. The learned Advocate, further, submitted that the show cause notice sought to deny the Modvat credit on the ground that the invoices were not valid duty-paying documents since they did not contain details as required under Rule 57G or 57GG of the Central Excise Rules, 1944; that, therefore, the finding that invoice dated 16-11-1994 is not a valid document, is beyond the purview of the show c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s not been the case of the Revenue that the inputs were not received by the appellants. They have also not disputed the duty-paid nature of the inputs. The Modvat credit has been disallowed on account of procedural lapses ignoring the subsequent amendment made in Rule 57G of the Rules by a Notification No. 7/99-C.E. (N.T.), dated 9-2-1999 and Board's Circular No. 441/7/99-CX., dated 23-2-1999. By ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
