Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2013 Year 2013 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - In the given situation and particularly ...

Income Tax

October 4, 2013

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - In the given situation and particularly as the addition for benami accounts stands deleted and there is no dispute about the facts that the accounts were duly audited and pertain to a much earlier year, it is not a fit case for levy of penalty - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars for the purpose of determining the tax u/s 115JB stands established - penalty confirmed - HC

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty and Registration Charges made out of Undisclosed Income - There was no dishonest intent of the assessee...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – Inaccurate particulars furnished - different stands taken before the AO and appellate authority - assessee did not come out clean -...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

  7. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

  8. Penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) deleted for want of a valid show cause notice u/s 274 of the Act. - AT

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted – the act of the assessee was bonafide even though the assessee may have failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was capital receipt - HC

  10. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates