Whether appellant is eligible to take CENVAT credit under Rule ...

Central Excise

November 1, 2014

Whether appellant is eligible to take CENVAT credit under Rule 3(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the entire duty paid by a 100% EOU under proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Held yes - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether appellant is eligible to take CENVAT credit under Rule ...

Central Excise

November 1, 2014

You may also like:

Allowability of refund of Cenvat credit availed on inputs used in the manufacture of goods cleared by DTA unit to a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) - refund allowed - AT

CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - Rule 9(1)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - CENVAT Credit on the basis of photocopy of seven bills of entry - Credit allowed - AT

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Whether certain pollution control services availed by the appellant are eligible to CENVAT Credit under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 - Held Yes,...

Cenvat Credit - Outdoor catering - input services - Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules(CCR), 2004 – statutory obligation under the Factories Act

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

CENVAT Credit - Inability to produce original invoices - appellant has wrongly availed the CENVAT Credit without an invoice prescribed under Rule 9(1)(f) of the CENVAT...

100% Export Oriented Unit – CENVAT credit cannot be utilized for paying Customs duty on imported goods and paying Excise duty on inputs which are cleared as such - AT

Cenvat Credit - 100% EOU - Reversal of cenvat credit availed on inputs removed from the factory as such against CT-3 certificate - no reversal of credit is required - AT

Refund of CENVAT Credit under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Notification

CENVAT credit - goods cleared to SEZ unit - Rule 6(6) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - the amendment carried out in Rule 6(6) by way of Notification No.50/2008 was retrospective.

Quick Updates: