Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2011 (7) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (7) TMI 1300 - SC - Indian LawsInterest on arrears of royalty - The first respondent is the holder of a mining lease for limestone. Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (‘Act’) deals with Royalties in respect of mining leases. Sub-section (2) requires the holder of a mining lease to pay royalty in respect of any mineral removed or consumed by him from the leased area at the rate for the time being specified in the Second Schedule to the Act. under Sub-section (3), Second Schedule was amended and the rate or royalty for limestone was increased from ₹ 10/-per tonne to ₹ 25/- per tonne by Central Govt. the first respondent in these appeals (‘contesting respondents’) filed writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of section 9(3) of the Act and the notification increasing the rate of royalty from ₹ 10 to ₹ 25 per tonne. In the case of J. K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd, the High Court made an interim order as in the other cases, with an additional condition that in case the said writ petitioner ultimately failed in the writ petition, the difference amount due from the writ petitioner shall be recovered with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. HELD THAT:- whenever there is an interim order of stay in regard to any revision in rate or tariff, unless the order granting interim stay or the final order dismissing the writ petition specifies otherwise, on the dismissal of the writ petition or vacation of the interim order, the beneficiary of the interim order shall have to pay interest on the amount withheld or not paid by virtue of the interim order. we are of the view that the appellants will be entitled to interest at 18% per annum in respect of royalty that became due between 17.2.1992 and the date of dismissal of their respective writ petitions. For the period subsequent to the dismissal of the writ petitions, the contesting respondents will be liable to pay interest on the said amount, at the rate of 24% per annum till date of payment. Whether Rule 64-A vests any discretion in the state government to charge interest at a rate less than 24% per annum in appropriate or deserving cases - HELD THAT:- It is true that annual interest at 24% per annum appears to be marginally higher than the standard market lending rate of interest. But it is not penal in nature. Revenue from mining constitutes one of the major sources of non-tax revenue of the State Governments. Mining lessees are expected to pay the mining dues promptly and without default. If a lesser rate of interest is provided under the Rules, it may lead to unscrupulous lessees indulging in delaying tactics. The intention of Rule 64A is to discourage practices that may be detrimental to recovery of revenue, by providing for a higher rate of interest.
|