Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2016 (12) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (12) TMI 1675 - HC - Indian LawsPayment of lease rent and fees for facility management - Held that: - In order to appreciate the contention that the notice dated 05.08.2008 issued by Store One was not vague, as held by the Arbitrator, it is necessary to refer to Clause 7.2 of the Lease Deed as well as to the notice issued by Store One - the complaint made by Store One was general in nature and did not specify any particular covenant of the Lease Deed that had been breached. The deficiencies pointed out also lacked the necessary specifics. In view of the above, the Arbitrator’s conclusion that the notice was vague and untenable cannot by any stretch be held to be perverse or patently illegal. The scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Act is limited and the Court does not sit in appeal over the decision of the Arbitrator - unless Store One is able to establish that any of the grounds as specified under Section 34 of the Act are met, the impugned award cannot be set aside. Petition dismissed.
|