Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2015 (5) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (5) TMI 431 - HC - Income TaxIncome from supply of software embedded in the hardware equipment or otherwise to customers in India - Does not amounts to royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and under Article 13(3) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTTA) between India and France, Canada, Germany, China etc. as per Tribunal - Held that:- Tribunal relied on ruling of this Court in Director of Income Tax V. Ericsson A.B.[2011 (12) TMI 91 - Delhi High Court ] wherein held that payment made to the assessee was in the nature of royalty either under the Income-Tax Act or under the DTAA. We have to keep in mind what was sold by the assessee to the Indian customers was a GSM which consisted both of the hardware as well as the software, therefore, the Tribunal is right in holding that it was not permissible for the Revenue to assess the same under two different articles. The software that was loaded on the hardware did not have any independent existence. The software supply is an integral part of the GSM mobile telephone system and is used by the cellular operator for providing the cellular services to its customers. There could not be any independent use of such software. The software is embodied in the system and the revenue accepts that it could not be used independently. This software merely facilitates the functioning of the equipment and is an integral part thereof. On these facts, it would be useful to refer to the judgment of the Supreme Court in TATA Consultancy Services Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004 (11) TMI 11 - Supreme Court ), wherein held that software which is incorporated on a media would be goods and,therefore, liable to sales tax. Thus A fortiorari when the assessee supplies the software which is incorporated on a CD, it has supplied tangible property and the payment made by the cellular operator for acquiring such property cannot be regarded as a payment by way of royalty. - Decided in favour of assessee.
|