Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (9) TMI 994 - AT - Income TaxEntitlement to Section 80IB(8A) deduction - whether the assessee’s sample storage incomes are to be held as derived from the eligible business for granting the impugned deduction or not? - Held that:- There is no dispute about the fact that the assessee is in the research and development field duly approved by the competent authority and already held entitled for Section 80 IB (8A) deduction. It enters into Master Service Agreement with its clients for conducting the above stated clinical studies. The same is a comprehensive document for conducting trial and analysis of clinical samples. This agreement contains a specific clause for samples’ retention in case of pendency of license approval application. We find that such procedures sometimes take years to complete. One of such an instance placed on record reveals that the assessee completed research study in March 2011, its client applied for drug license in USA and the said authority inspected its premises storing samples in question in May 2014. This letter issued by Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food & Drug Administration, Silver Suffering, MD 20993 to this effect is dated 01.07.2015. The Revenue fails to rebut this factual position. The case file further reveals that the assessee’s clients have to exercise an option of discarding, returning and retention of samples in lieu of paying the impugned storage studies. We put up a specific query to the Revenue as to whether the assessee stores such sample only after concluding clinical studies for its clients or it collects the same from outside as well. The replies received in favour of the first option only. All these discussions lead us to infer that the assessee conducts its clinical study and stores the relevant samples at its client’s behest till the license approval is obtained. The same can’t be held to be an activity not forming intrinsic part of its clinical studies conducted. Nor its sample storage income is of such a nature which can be held as not ‘derived’ from the eligible business. The Revenue’s argument is accordingly rejected. Thus the assessee’s sample storage income is very much derived from its research and development activity only. - Decided against Revenue.
|