Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2016 (6) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (6) TMI 816 - HC - CustomsProceedings against the CHA - validity in continuation of proceedings where, in order in original commissioner set aside the demand on the importer - Held that:- We asked then Mr. Jetly as to how the notice dated 2nd December, 2015, addressed to the petitioner by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, survives. Why should then the petitioner be proceeded against under Regulation 20 of the Customs Broker Licencing Regulations, 2013, as none of the charges, prima facie, can be then substantiated particularly in the teeth of the conclusions recorded in the order-in-original. Mr. Jetly states that the Commissioner would duly take note of this order of 26th February, 2016, marked "X" for identification and pass consequential orders, but would require three months' time. - Commissioner directed to pass all consequential orders within prescribed time frame.
|