Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 1967 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

1967 (7) TMI 89 - HC - Companies Law

The judgment by Buckley, J. in the Chancery Division discussed the importance of evidence in winding-up petitions under section 169 of the Companies Act, 1948. The court emphasized the need for true evidential value over hearsay evidence when grave allegations are made against a company or its officers. In cases where the company does not contest the petition, evidence presented may be considered sufficient for a winding-up order. The court made a compulsory winding-up order in the absence of any opposition.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates