Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
The judgment by Buckley, J. in the Chancery Division discussed the importance of evidence in winding-up petitions under section 169 of the Companies Act, 1948. The court emphasized the need for true evidential value over hearsay evidence when grave allegations are made against a company or its officers. In cases where the company does not contest the petition, evidence presented may be considered sufficient for a winding-up order. The court made a compulsory winding-up order in the absence of any opposition.
|