Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com   

Income Tax Case Laws - Section: 234

Home Case Index Income Tax Sections List
Filter:
Cases for Section: 234
Showing 1 to 15 of 19 Records
 

2014 (7) TMI 466 - ITAT MUMBAI

Eminent Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT Central Circle-31, Mumbai

Interest expenditure Held that - The decision in Eminent Holdings Pvt. Ltd. 2014 (7) TMI 2 - ITAT MUMBAI and Hitesh S. Mehta Versus DCIT Central Circle- 23, Mumbai 2013 (10) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI - books of accounts produced by the assessee during the assessment proceedings has been held to be unreliable - rejection/ reliability of the books of accounts and the proposed adjudication of the CIT(A) in view of the direction may have direct impact o.....


2014 (7) TMI 505 - ITAT DELHI

Sood Brij & Associates Versus ACIT, Circle-37(1), New Delhi

Validity of reassessment u/s 147/148 of the Act Held that - The decision in ACIT, Circle 37(1), New Delhi Versus Sood Brij & Associates 2014 (7) TMI 496 - ITAT DELHI followed - the reasons were recorded on 30th March, 2010 and on the same date notice u/s 148 was issued - The reason were supplied to the assessee - the re-assessment proceedings cannot be held to be bad in law - the notice was served on the assessee - the reasons recorded by the.....


2013 (8) TMI 668 - ITAT HYDERABAD

M/s. Mali Florex Ltd. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Rectification of mistake - Tribunal directed AO to recalculate interest u/s 234A, 234B and adjustment of seized amount with advance tax - A.O. failed to follow direction - Held that - There is no mistake in the said order of the Tribunal, warranting any rectification, as the Tribunal made it amply clear and gave direction that seized amount has to be adjusted first towards existing liabilities and thereafter it should be adjusted towards the outs.....


2013 (5) TMI 560 - ITAT PUNE

Kasturilal Sardarilal Luthra Urmil Versus DCIT Central Circle-I, Nashik

Income from undisclosed sources Appeal is related to two assessment years - AO made additions in income sustained by Ld. CIT(A) - Addition in income made u/s 153A of the Act - Held that - Assessee in his statement recorded u/s.132(4) has offered the amount of Rs. 4,21,000/- as his income from undisclosed sources. Further, during the course of assessment proceedings the assessee in his letter addressed to the AO has accepted for the addition to be.....


2013 (4) TMI 144 - Bombay High Court

Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Kotak Securities Ltd. (No. 2)

Remitting the matter back to the file of the A.O - Depreciation U/s 32 on Intangible Assets - Interest U/s 234C - Bad debt - Held that - The Tribunal, as noted above, has considered it appropriate to restore the issue back to the Assessing Officer on the ground that neither the Assessing Officer nor the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has considered as to whether there was a default on the part of the assessee in the payment of advance tax. .....


2011 (4) TMI 106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Agra Versus M/s Hind Lamps Ltd., Shikohabad

Interest u/s 234B and 234C - unpaid bonus - it was submitted by the assessee, that the provision was made by the assessee company in its books of account for bonus payable to the employees and the said amount was deductible on payment thereof to the employees on or before 30th November, 1996, being the due date for filing of the Income-tax return. The assessee could not have anticipated that the said amount of bonus shall remain unpaid upto 30th .....


2008 (4) TMI 370 - ITAT LUCKNOW-B

Income-Tax Officer. Versus Dr. Sameer Kant Agarwal.

Maintainability


2007 (3) TMI 161 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SMT. AE SAROJINI

Assessment Question raised that whether the assessee is entitled for the capital gain exemption u/s 54F for extension of house Held that exemption can t be denied by order u/s 143(1)(a)


2007 (1) TMI 137 - BOMBAY High Court

Motilal M. Gupta Versus Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax And Others

...... of Income-tax under section 119(2)(a) of the Act on March 20, 2006 and remit the matter back to the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax to consider the application of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon. Rule is made absolute in terms of this order with no order as to costs. The writ petition stands disposed of.


2006 (11) TMI 132 - DELHI HIGH COURT

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus P. HI SEEDS INDIA LTD

Penalty u/s 271 (1) (c) erroneous claim for deduction can t be equated to concealment of income - Since all the transactions had been mentioned by the Assessee in its Return, there is no concealment of income - Section 271(1)(c) is attracted only in those instances where the Assessee has concealed the particulars of his income, or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income hence penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not imposable in instant case


2005 (12) TMI 88 - KERALA High Court

Seapearl Enterprises Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax.

......itioners or any assessee can file. I am also in agreement with the decision above referred to of the Punjab and Haryana High Court wherein the Division Bench held that the amendment is calculated to clarify the ambiguity that was felt in the original provisions. In the circumstances, the original petitions are devoid of any merit and are dismissed.


2005 (5) TMI 547 - ITAT MUMBAI

Income-tax Officer, Ward 5(1), Kalyan, Mumbai Versus Prabhu K. Chandnani

Interest chargeable, Rectification of mistake


2002 (3) TMI 41 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court

Raj Kumar Singal Versus Union of India And Others.

......of the alleged commission of the offence. However, on consideration of the matter, we find that it does not provide for any penalty. It only regulates the levy of interest. Thus, no violation of article 20 is involved. No other point has been raised. In view of the above, we find no merit in this petition. It is, consequently, dismissed in limine.


2002 (1) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court

Ashoka Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And Others

......ctions 234A and 234B was leviable on the returned income or on the assessed income. There is no such dispute in the present case. The returned income in the present case is the same as has been determined as taxable income as per the intimation dated September 13, 1999. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the writ petition is dismissed in limine.


2001 (12) TMI 62 - DELHI High Court

Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Motor General Finance Ltd.

......dence Act should be drawn to the effect that had those documents been produced, the same would have gone against the interest of the assessee, we are of the opinion that the questions of law involved in the instant case should be answered in the negative, i.e., in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. This appeal is disposed accordingly.


 
   
 
 
1
 

what is new what is new

Latest

Featured

Experts

Subscription

More Options

Communication




|| About us || Contact us || Feed Back || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Website