Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Customs SC Customs - SC
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Customs - Supreme Court - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 1735 Records

  • 2018 (2) TMI 854 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s MRF Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs

    Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Refund claim - the decision in the case of MRF Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Chennai 2017 (5) TMI 1324 - CESTAT CHENNAI contested - Held that - Delay of 174 days in filing the appeal is condoned subject to payment of costs of ₹ 2,00,000/- to be deposited by the petitioner with the Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamilnadu within four weeks........ + More


  • 2018 (1) TMI 33 - SUPREME COURT

    Well Weave Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that a case for penalty/confiscation under Sections 111 and 112 of the Customs Act is made out on the facts brought on record by the Revenue? - the decision in the case of Well Weave Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner 2017 (3) TMI 1589 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that the Department has failed to establish that the finding which has....... + More


  • 2017 (12) TMI 1517 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus La-Cast Metals & Components Pvt. Ltd.

    Classification of goods - Exemption Notification No. 23/98-Cus. - Piston Ring Set imported by the respondents herein for use as components/parts of engines of Shakti Power Tillers - the decision in the case of COMMR. OF CUS. (I), MUMBAI Versus LA-CAST METALS & COMPONENTS PVT. LTD. 2005 (12) TMI 509 - CESTAT, MUMBAI contested, where it was held that Tillers rightly classified under Chapter heading 84.32 - Held that - The judgment impugned does....... + More


  • 2017 (12) TMI 107 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Customs Versus M/s. Aasu Exim Pvt. Ltd.

    Misdeclaraion of imported goods - According to the Revenue, the goods were to be graded only as Grade A and AA whereas the assessee had graded the goods under the grades A, B and C - Section 130E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Held that - Insofar as grading is concerned, apart from the letter dated 22.12.2000 of the Board of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan confirming that grades B, C and D also exist, what was available on reco....... + More


  • 2017 (11) TMI 1490 - SUPREME COURT

    The Development Commissioner Mepz Special Economic Zone And Heous & Others Versus M/s Hospira Health Care India Pvt Ltd

    Stay of the reimbursement of the amount - the decision in the case of The Development Commissioner, MEPZ, Special Economic Zone & HEOUs, The Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) , The Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and Industry Versus M/s. Hospira Health Care India Pvt. Ltd. 2017 (7) TMI 786 - MADRAS HIGH COURT contested - Held that - The amount is not yet quantified - we are not inclined to stay the operation of the impugned order - dec....... + More


  • 2017 (11) TMI 1193 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s. Naresh Kumar Meena Thr. Its Sole Proprietor Naresh Kumar Meena Versus Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur

    Revocation of CHA License - the decision in the case of Commissioner of Customs Versus M/s Naresh Kumar Meena 2017 (11) TMI 1159 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that The view taken by the Tribunal is required to be reversed in view of the licence which was granted by the competent authority to particular person with a particular purpose to be utilized by the same in sub-delegation to any person is required to be deprecated - H....... + More


  • 2017 (11) TMI 53 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Customs Versus M/s. Magus Metals P. Ltd. & Others

    Release of seized goods - imported goods, copper concentrate - hazardous waste or not - Held that - the order of the Adjudicating Authority that the samples from the consignments dated 24.12.2001 and 24.01.2002 are hazardous waste and not Copper Concentrate is open to serious doubt, the benefit of which must go in favour of the importer in the light of the totality of the materials on record - appeal of Revenue dismissed. - The subject goods have....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 1281 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Commissioner Of Customs, New Delhi Versus M/s Supertron Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

    In view of the findings recorded by the learned Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and the O.M. dated 05.06.2013 of the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, we find no ground to interfere - appeal dismissed........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 953 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s. Prashray Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Exports) Chennai

    Levy of CVD on import of silk fabrics - the decision in the case of The Commissioner of Customs (Exports) Versus M/s. Prashray Overseas Private Limited, Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal 2016 (5) TMI 1106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that In cases where the exemption Notification stipulates two conditions, namely that the inputs should have suffered duty and that no CENVAT credit should have been availed, the....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1086 - SUPREME COURT

    Inspector of Customs Versus Daphira Wallang

    Attempt to export Heroin through Courier - Lapse on the part of prosecution to record the information - offence punishable under Section 23(C) and 28 of NDPS Act - Blue Dart Express Office and persons booking the parcel - the decision in the case of DAPHIRA WALLANG Versus INSPECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE 2014 (9) TMI 973 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that The entire proceedings would come to naught, by virtue of the search an....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1024 - SUPREME COURT

    Purti Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Project import - denial of the benefit of N/N. 6/2002-CE dt.1.3.2002 - import of steam turbine gearbox and spares - the decision in the case of M/s. Purti Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Import) , Mumbai-I 2016 (11) TMI 983 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested, where it was held that we are not convinced with the appellants plea that the turbine is eligible for nil rate of duty under Sl. No. 251 of Notification No. 6/2000, read with Sl........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1023 - SUPREME COURT

    Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata Versus India Trident Maritime (Pvt.) Ltd.

    To what extent the Kolkata Port Trust (in short KPT ) is entitled to recover demurrage charges from the respondent no. 1/writ petitioner in respect of containers in which poppy seed was imported by the respondent company from Karachi to Kolkata on route to Nepal - the decision in the case of The Board of Trustees, For the Port of Calcutta & Ors. Versus India Trident Maritime (Pvt.) Ltd. & Ors. 2016 (7) TMI 277 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT contes....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 814 - SUPREME COURT

    Saint Gobain Glass India Ltd. Versus Union of India

    Interpretation of statute - meaning of the term domestic industry - Rule 2(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules - the decision in the case of NIRMA LIMITED Versus SAINT GOBAIN GLASS INDIA LTD. 2012 (10) TMI 832 - MADRAS HIGH COURT contested - Held that - we do not consider it necessary to go into the issue(s) arising in the present Special Leave Petitions, namely, the precise meaning of the term domestic industry in Rule 2(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules wh....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 813 - SUPREME COURT

    AGC Networks Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Valuation - Technology Transfer Agreement - Whether royalty paid in terms, is a condition of sale includible in the assessable value - Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 2008 - the decision in the case of CC, New Delhi Versus M/s Avaya Global Connect Ltd. 2016 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT NEW DELHI , contested, where it was held that as the Supply Agreement is consistent with the Technology Transfer Ag....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 812 - SUPREME COURT

    Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Permission to withdraw the appeal - Eligibility for concessional rate of additional duty of customs in accordance with N/N. 6/2006-CE dated 1st March 2006 and N/N. 12/2012-CE dated 17th March 2012 - classification of imported goods - external hard disks classified under heading 84717030 or 84717040 of the Schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985? - the decision in the case of Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. Manoj Gupta, Manish Agarwal, Fortun....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 771 - SUPREME COURT

    Kumho Petrochemicals Co. Ltd. Versus Union of India

    Imposition of ADD - rubber chemicals - imported from China PR and Korea RP - N/N. 4/2016 - CUS (ADD) dated 29/1/2016 of Ministry of Finance - principles of natural justice - the decision in the case of M/s Rishiroop Polymers Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Kumho Petrochemicals Co. Ltd. Versus Union of India/DA 2016 (11) TMI 88 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested - Held that - the decision in the above case upheld - present SLP dismissed - decided against petitioner........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 770 - SUPREME COURT

    Rishiroop Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India

    Imposition of ADD - rubber chemicals - imported from China PR and Korea RP - N/N. 4/2016 - CUS (ADD) dated 29/1/2016 of Ministry of Finance - principles of natural justice - the decision in the case of M/s Rishiroop Polymers Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Kumho Petrochemicals Co. Ltd. Versus Union of India/DA 2016 (11) TMI 88 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested - Held that - the decision in the above case upheld - present SLP dismissed - decided against petitioner........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 684 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Versus Pushpa Lekhumal Tolani

    Import of gold and diamond jewellery items - Baggage Rules - passing through the Green Channel - Smuggling - Whether the items are personal effects and no duty is leviable on the same - whether in the present facts and circumstances of the case, the show-cause notice dated 12.12.2002 and order dated 14.08.2003 are liable to be quashed or not? - Held that - the respondent herein did not violate the provisions of Section 77 of the Act since the nec....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 683 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Ace Designers Ltd.

    Quantum of paltry amount involved in the appeal - Import - Re-import of exported goods - the decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), BANGALORE Versus ACE DESIGNERS LTD. 2006 (1) TMI 424 - CESTAT, BANGALORE , contested - Held that - In view of the paltry amount involved in the matter, we decline to entertain the civil appeal. Accordingly, the civil appeal is dismissed....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 682 - SUPREME COURT

    Rishiroop Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Versus Designated Authority, DGAD, MOF

    Enhancement of Anti Dumping Duty - rubber chemicals known as PX13 (6 PPD) - Mid Term Review - Notification No. 92/2011-Cus. dated 20.09.2011 - imports of subject goods from PR China and Korea RP - Rule 23 of Anti Dumping Rules indicate the powers of the DA to review the need for continued imposition of any AD duty on its own initiative or upon request by any interested party - the decision in the case of M/s Rishiroop Polymers Pvt. Ltd., M/s Kumh....... + More


1........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version