Feedback   New User   Subscription   Demo   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Customs SC Customs - SC
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Customs - Supreme Court - Case Laws

Showing 61 to 80 of 1737 Records

  • 2016 (11) TMI 1431 - SUPREME COURT

    Seeking quash of letter dated June 18, 2013 and declaration that the condition Nos.34(b) and 34(c) of the notification No.12 of 2012, was satisfied by the petitioner while importing - Import of gold dore bar - goods are to be imported in accordance with the packaging list issued by the mining company by whom they are produced - the decision in the case of The Chairman Central Board of Excise And Customs, Commissioner of Customs Versus M/s. Rajesh....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 613 - SUPREME COURT

    Valuation of goods - Related person - the decision in the case of Ansaldo STS Transportation Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Chennai 2015 (11) TMI 445 - CESTAT CHENNAI contested - Held that - We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai - The civil appeal is accordingly dismissed. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 501 - SUPREME COURT

    DEPB Scheme - the case of M/s Shri Rolex Rings Pvt. Ltd., Shri Manesh Madeka Versus Commissioner of Customs, Kandla 2015 (11) TMI 446 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD contested - no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment - appeal dismissed. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 500 - SUPREME COURT

    Refund of Special additional customs duty (SAD) - limitation bar - the decision in the case of Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Customs 2014 (4) TMI 870 - DELHI HIGH COURT contested - SLP dismissed on ground of limitation. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 499 - SUPREME COURT

    Offense of smuggling - Import of prohibited / restricted goods - Levy of penalty - the decision in the case of Mahender Jain, Gopal Dokania, Anup Singh, Arun Dokania, Sanjeev Jain, Nitesh Kumar Kedia, Anudeep Singh Versus The Commissioner of Customs (Import And General) And Others 2015 (3) TMI 1037 - DELHI HIGH COURT contested - SLP dismissed. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 498 - SUPREME COURT

    Tribunal relying on its own order in assessee s own case set aside the penalty imposed u/s 114A - the decision in the case of COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, SURAT-II Versus MICRO POLYESTER PVT. LTD. 2009 (1) TMI 101 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT contested - Held that - Since the tax effect is insignificant, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal - appeal dismissed. ....... + More


  • 2016 (10) TMI 1152 - SUPREME COURT

    Condonation of delay in filing appeal - the decision in the case of Sunil Gupta Versus Union of India And Others 2014 (12) TMI 151 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT contested - Held that - delay cannot be condoned - SLP dismissed on the ground of delay........ + More


  • 2016 (10) TMI 1116 - SUPREME COURT

    Demand of Interest - Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 - penalty - decision in the case of ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTES & RESEARCH CENTRE 2016 (4) TMI 440 - CESTAT NEW DELHI referred - Held that - the issue is fairly covered by the judgment of this Court in CC (I&G) v. Care Foundation 2014 (3) TMI 641 - DELHI HIGH COURT , where it was held that no exception can be taken to the finding that since there was no demand under section 28(8) of the Cu....... + More


  • 2016 (10) TMI 566 - SUPREME COURT

    Recovery of Duty drawback - non receipt of export proceeds - demand of duty with interest - jurisdiction of Assistant Collector of Customs - Rule 16A of the Duty Drawback Rules 1995 - Section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - whether Rule 16A of the Duty Drawback Rules 1995 had retrospective effect and the drawback before 06.12.1995 can be recovered? - Held that - Suffice is to point out that the effect of Section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962, is that in ....... + More


  • 2016 (10) TMI 562 - SUPREME COURT

    Proper officer - Juridiction to issue Show Cause Notice - Constitutional validity and effect of Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Validity of SCN issued by the Additional Director General, DRI, Bangalore - Apex court stayed the operation of the impugned judgment 2016 (5) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT ....... + More


  • 2016 (10) TMI 380 - SUPREME COURT

    Levy of Anti dumping duty - Interpretation of rule 7 - confidentiality of information - Whether the interpretation placed upon Rule 7 of the Rules is correct insofar as it diminishes the rule of confidentiality statutorily provided for under Rule 7? - the decision in the case of Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Designated Authority & Others 2006 (9) TMI 180 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA referred to - Held that - Reliance Industries case did not go into....... + More


  • 2016 (10) TMI 264 - SUPREME COURT

    Allegation of illegal export - export of ready made garments after fulfilling all the legal requirements - entire remittance from exports received by the respondents - whether remittances by way of Hawala was carried on by the assessee and whether the assessee was engaged in illegal exports? - CESTAT held assessee to be genuine and no Hawala transactions involved - Held that - the entire material placed before CESTAT has been discussed and on tha....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 1383 - SUPREME COURT

    Penalty - non-performance/non-compliance of Past Performance Entitlement - the decision in the case of Eveline International Versus Union of India 2014 (9) TMI 1134 - DELHI HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that to enable the appellant to succeed on the said plea, it was incumbent upon the appellant to establish that the shortfall was only in quota items of US 338 and not in other quota of different countries code but which the appellant ha....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 1258 - SUPREME COURT

    The impugned orders dated 12th July, 2016 and 2nd August, 2016 passed by the High Court set aside - until the final decision of the writ petitions, the goods be not released and the auction (if any) will not take place without the leave of the Court - appeal disposed off........ + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 526 - SUPREME COURT

    Validity of judgement - Rigorous Imprisonment and fine - Offences under Sections 22 and 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - CHA - Transit Certificate - secret information of receipt of dry fruits which had the marking of AB , contained some narcotics as well - summon of two witnesses - search - section 50 of the Customs Act, 1962 - concealment of 165 packets of brown powder weighing 21 kilograms 450 grams was revealed....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 417 - SUPREME COURT

    Recommendations on the maintenance of minimum distance in customs area - between hazardous cargo and general cargo - between hazardous cargo and administrative buildings - Circular No.40/2016-Customs - Held that - clarification issued that the Circular No.40/2016-Customs may be treated as laying down the prescribed guidelines, for safety and security, across the Board, for maintaining distance, between hazardous cargo and general cargo, as also, ....... + More


  • 2016 (9) TMI 360 - SUPREME COURT

    Refund of SAD - goods imported from Nepal - Notification No. 124/2000 amending the earlier Notification No. 37/96 and enlarging the scope of exemption from basic customs duty by including SAD - retrospective effect of amendment - exemption from customs, excise duty and also SAD - rates of SAD rectified - Held that - The exemption which was granted by notification dated 29th September, 2000 was, therefore, in the nature of specific and new exempti....... + More


  • 2016 (8) TMI 1313 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Maintainability of appeal - the Division Bench has opined that there had been no full disclosure by the assessee. Mr. Bagaria would seriously oppose the same by submitting that the entire facts and figures were departmentally scrutinized and it was found that there had been full disclosure - Held that - it is a fit case where the judgment and order passed by the High Court and the order passed by the Settlement Commission should be set aside, sub....... + More


  • 2016 (8) TMI 1294 - SUPREME COURT

    Pre-deposit - 1 of penalty - petitioner pointed out that in another proceedings arising out of the same chain of transactions, where, Tribunal had required the petitioner to deposit ₹ 1 lac by way of pre-deposit looking to his status as an employee - The decision in the case of Chhaganlal Arun Versus Union Of India 2016 (4) TMI 1283 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that looking to his position as an employee, we modify the ....... + More


  • 2016 (8) TMI 1181 - SUPREME COURT

    Proper officer - Jurisdiction to issue SCN - the decision in the case of M/s Mangali Impex Ltd., M/s Pace International And Others Versus Union of India And Others 2016 (5) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT referred - Held that - Exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file synopsis and list of dates granted........ + More


4........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version