Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases FEMA HC FEMA - HC
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

FEMA - High Court - Case Laws

Showing 341 to 355 of 355 Records

  • 1984 (8) TMI 200 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

    ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE Versus FR. JM STEVENS

    Foreign exchange - Seizure and penalty not maintainable, if dealings in foreign exchange of foreign national not proved....... + More


  • 1984 (3) TMI 416 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

    UNION OF INDIA Versus EXCHANGE REGULATION APPELLATE BOARD AND OTHERS

    ... ...
    ... ... re set aside and the case is sent back to the Additional Director, Enforcement, i.e. the adjudicating officer, for re-trial and decision afresh after hearing both the parties. The record of the case summoned earlier be sent back forthwith. No costs.


  • 1984 (3) TMI 375 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

    KARTAR SINGH Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION ACT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, JULLUNDUR

    ... ...
    ... ... s a result of the above discussion, this appeal succeeds and is allowed to the extent indicated above. The appellant will be entitled to the refund of ₹ 15,000/- out of the sum of ₹ 20.000/- if already deposited by him by way of penalty.


  • 1984 (2) TMI 353 - Madras High Court

    A.S.G. Jothimani Nadar Versus The Deputy Director, Enforcement

    ... ...
    ... ... fail and will accordingly stand dismissed. The trial Court, is however, instructed to dispose of the case according to merits, and not to be influenced in any manner, by the dismissal of this petition, or by any of the observations contained herein.


  • 1984 (2) TMI 229 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    KT. ADVANI Versus THE STATE

    ... ...
    ... ... nation. The authorities are, however, under an implied duty to warn the petitioner before examination that if they made a statement, it could be used against them. The impugned orders of the learned Additional Sessions Judge are modified accordingly.


  • 1984 (1) TMI 332 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

    WR. BOURI Versus CHAIRMAN, FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATIONS APPELLATE BOARD, NEW DELHI

    ... ...
    ... ... vided under Section 59 of the Act. 4. In this view of the matter, this appeal succeeds and is allowed. The order of the Board is set aside. The appellant is not found guilty of any charge framed against him and he is, thus liable to no penalty.


  • 1984 (1) TMI 190 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

    MAHARAJA FASTERNERS Versus DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT

    ... ...
    ... ... reduced from Rs. 6,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- only. 5. emsp Consequently, S.A.O No. 53 of 1983, fails and is dismissed whereas S.A.O. No. 67 of 1982 is partly accepted to the extent that the penalty imposed is reduced from Rs. 6,000/- to Rs. 5,000/- only.


  • 1983 (3) TMI 170 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    BANSAL EXPORTS (P) LTD. AND ANOTHER Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    ... ...
    ... ... and amended from time to time at the sweet will and pleasure of the parties. The said contract could not be regarded as any firm commitment. On this ground alone the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. 86.The petitions are dismissed with costs.


  • 1982 (7) TMI 264 - Bombay High Court

    BHAGWANDAS S. TOLANI Versus BC. AGGARWAL AND OTHERS

    ... ...
    ... ... f his own wrong. This is not the department’s case in the present matter. 8.  In the result, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b). The respondents to pay the costs of the petition to the petitioner on the usual scale.


  • 1981 (6) TMI 131 - High Court Of Madras

    Kaiser Otmar Versus State Of Tamil Nadu

    ... ...
    ... ... the detention. We accordingly quash the order of detention of the State Government, dated" 31st January, 1981 under section 3(1) of the COFEPOSA Act and direct the respondents herein to set the petitioner at liberty. Order of detention quashed.


  • 1977 (7) TMI 114 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

    Bhagwati Prasad Khaitan Versus The Special Director

    ... ...
    ... ... fect to the same so far as the petitioner is concerned. This, however, will not prevent the respondent authorities from issuing any fresh notice in accordance with law on proper materials, if they are so entitled. There will be no order as to costs.


  • 1975 (11) TMI 176 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    K.A. Abdul Khader Versus The Deputy Director of Enforcement Information Directorate

    ... ...
    ... ... od of one year. Since notice as required by the Rules had not been effected, the extended period is not available to the department. 6. The petition is accordingly allowed, and the rule nisi is made absolute. But, there will be no order as to costs.


  • 1975 (7) TMI 156 - Calcutta High Court

    New Central Jute Mills Co Ltd Versus. TN Kaul

    ... ...
    ... ... ule is made absolute to the extent indicated above. Let write in the nature of certiorari and mandamus issue accordingly. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Operation of this order is stayed for six weeks.


  • 1973 (2) TMI 132 - Madras High Court

    R.M.S. Shanmugham Chettiar And. Versus s Gian Cheng Kiet

    ... ...
    ... ... herefore, the civil miscellaneous appeal has to be dismissed. The question as to the correct exchange value has to be agitated in the proper forum. The civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. 5. Appeal dismissed.


  • 1955 (3) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

    ARTHUR ALEXANDER WATSON Versus STATE

    ... ...
    ... ... utta not to book any air or other passage for the appellant until further orders of this Court is also withdrawn. The Security Police is directed to inform the Air Liners, Steamship Companies and Indian Railways concerned of this order of withdrawal.


....18
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version