Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Article Section
Home Articles Service Tax Bimal jain
← Previous Next →

Services by Senior Advocates to Business Entities brought under Reverse Charge

Submit New Article
 
Services by Senior Advocates to Business Entities brought under Reverse Charge
By: Bimal jain
June 11, 2016
  • Contents

Dear Professional Colleague,

Services by Senior Advocates to Business Entities brought under Reverse Charge

Vide the Union Budget, 2016, Service tax on Senior Advocates providing services to a Business Entity was brought under ‘Forward charge’ w.e.f. April 1, 2016. However, Service tax on services provided by individual Advocates and firm of Advocates (other than Senior Advocates) to Business Entity continued to be under ‘Reverse charge’.

Such amendment created hue and cry amongst the Senior Advocates, who approached the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat, Calcutta, Allahabad & Delhi and also got the stay, on operation of stated amendment.

Now, the Central Government has issued 3 notifications dated June 6, 2016 in this regard to provide as under:

Notification No. 32/2016 – ST dated June 6, 2016 (“Notification No. 32”): Exempts legal services provided by Senior Advocates to Business Entities with a turnover up to ₹ 10 Lakhs in preceding Financial Year

The Central Government vide Notification No. 32 has substituted Entry No. 6(c) of the Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated June 20, 2012 (“the Mega Exemption Notification”), to exempt the services provided by a Senior Advocate by way of legal services to:

  • Any person other than a Business Entity; or
  • A Business Entity with a turnover up to ₹ 10 Lakhs in the preceding Financial Year.

Erstwhile Entry No. 6(c) of the Mega Exemption Notification

Substituted Entry No. 6(c) of the Mega Exemption Notification

6. Services provided by:

(c) a senior advocate by way of legal services to a person other than a person ordinarily carrying out any activity relating to industry, commerce or any other business or profession

6. Services provided by:

(c) a senior advocate by way of legal services to-

(i) any person other than a business entity; or

(ii) a business entity with a turnover up to rupees ten lakh in the preceding financial year;

Notification No. 33/2016–ST dated June 6, 2016 (“Notification No. 33”): Services by Senior Advocates to Business Entities would be taxable under Reverse Charge

The Central Government vide Notification No. 33 has amended Rule 2(1)(d) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 (“the Service Tax Rules”), to bring the services provided by Senior Advocates under Reverse Charge Mechanism. It is further provided that in case of representational services by Senior Advocates, where the contract for provision of such service has been entered through another Advocate/ Firm of Advocates, and the Senior Advocate is providing such services, the recipient of such services, i.e. the Business Entity who is litigant/ applicant/ petitioner, would be liable to pay Service tax.

Relevant sub-clauses of Erstwhile Rule 2(1)(d) of the Service Tax Rules

Relevant sub-clauses of Rule 2(1)(d) of the Service Tax Rules, as substituted/inserted

(D) in relation to service provided or agreed to be provided by,-

(I)………, or

(II) a firm of advocates or an individual advocate other than a senior advocate by way of legal services

(D) in relation to service provided or agreed to be provided by,-

(I)………, or

(II) an individual advocate or a firm of advocates by way of legal services other than representational services by senior advocates

 

After item (D), the following item is inserted, namely:-

"(DD) in relation to service provided or agreed to be provided by a senior advocate by way of representational services before any court, tribunal or authority, directly or indirectly, to any business entity located in the taxable territory, including where contract for provision of such service has been entered through another advocate or a firm of advocates, and the senior advocate is providing such services, the recipient of such services, which is the business entity who is litigant, applicant, or petitioner, as the case may be"

Notification No. 34/2016–ST dated June 6, 2016 (“Notification No. 34”): 100% liability on service recipient to pay Service tax on services of Senior Advocates

The Central Government vide Notification No. 34 has amended the Reverse Charge Notification No. 30/3012-ST dated June 20, 2012 (“the Reverse Charge Notification”) to include the above mentioned changes in Paragraph I thereunder. Further, in Paragragh II, in the Table, S. No. 5 has also been substituted to stipulate payment of tax by the recipient of the services provided by Senior Advocates under Full Reverse Charge i.e. 100% to be paid by the service recipient:

Erstwhile S. No. 5 of the Reverse Charge Notification

Substituted S. No. 5 of the Reverse Charge Notification

In respect of services provided or agreed to be provided by a firm of advocates or an individual advocate other than a senior advocate by way of legal services

In respect of services provided or agreed to be provided by an individual advocate or firm of advocates by way of legal services, directly or indirectly"

Furthermore, after Explanation II, Explanation III has been inserted to provide that the Business Entity located in the taxable territory who is litigant, applicant or petitioner, as the case may be, shall be treated as the person who receives the legal services for the purpose of the Reverse Charge Notification.

Our Comments:

Bringing back the services of Senior Advocates under Reverse Charge must have brought a sign of relief amongst the Senior Advocates. However, the language used in the Notifications falls short of absolute clarity as to the real status of the services other than Representation services provided/ agreed to be provided by the Senior Advocates either directly to clients being a Business Entity or to another advocate or firms of advocates using the services for ultimate benefits of the clients.

Further, the above mentioned Notifications are effective from June 6, 2016, which again poses a question on liability to pay Service tax on the services provided by Senior Advocates during the period from April 1, 2016 to June 5, 2016, when Forward Charge levy on Senior Advocates was effective but stay was granted by the various Hon’ble High Courts. It would be prudent if the Board issues some clarification in this regard.

Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavours. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.

 

By: Bimal jain - June 11, 2016

 

 

 
← Previous Next →
what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version