Tax Management India. Com
Subscription  |   New User  |   Login
Acts/ Rules Notifications Circulars Forms Tariff/ ITC HSN Case Laws Manuals Short Notes
Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Tri Service Tax + Tri
← Previous Next →
  • Contents
  • Referred In

 

User Login
Username  
Password  
Stay sign in     

Forget password        New User/ Regiser

Annual Subscription

Demo / Trial Options

 

Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune I Versus Eaton Industries P. Ltd.

Refund - export of services - relevant date - The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that in such a case the relevant date is the date when the payment of service (exported) is received by the assessee not the date when the service is provided. Against ....... + More
  1. Commr. of Customs, CEST, Hyderabad Versus M/s Hyundai Motor India Engg. [P] Ltd. - 2017 (10) TMI 17 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

  2. C.C.,C. EX. & S.T., Hyderabad-IV Versus Hyundai Motor (I) Engineering (P) Ltd. - 2016 (7) TMI 1346 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

  3. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad-IV Commissionerate Versus M/s Hyundai Motor India Engineering (P) Ltd. - 2015 (3) TMI 1049 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

  4. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai Versus M/s Sequoia Capital India Advisors Pvt. Ltd., M/s Morgan Stanley India Service Pvt. Ltd. - 2018 (2) TMI 152 - CESTAT MUMBAI

  5. M/s. Unilever Industries Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore Service Tax-II - 2017 (12) TMI 1497 - CESTAT BANGALORE

  6. Conexant Systems Pvt. Ltd Versus CCE & ST, Hyderabad-IV - 2017 (7) TMI 904 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

  7. M/s Alar Impex Pvt. Ltd., M/s Alar Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Versus CC & CST, Delhi–I - 2017 (9) TMI 707 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

  8. MPS Limited Versus C.S.T. Delhi - 2017 (4) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

  9. M/s Infosys Technologies Ltd., Electronics City Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore. - 2016 (2) TMI 849 - CESTAT BANGALORE

  10. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa Versus M/s. Ratio Pharma India Pvt. Ltd. - 2015 (11) TMI 107 - CESTAT MUMBAI

  11. M/s. Kirloskar Ebara Pumps Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur - 2015 (2) TMI 612 - CESTAT MUMBAI

  12. ALAR INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., DELHI-I - 2015 (9) TMI 783 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

  13. Hyundai Motor India Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Hyderabad-II - 2014 (7) TMI 329 - CESTAT BANGALORE

  14. M/s AFFINITY EXPRESS INDIA PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE I - 2014 (6) TMI 593 - CESTAT MUMBAI

  15. TACO FAURECIA DESIGN CENTER PVT LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-III - 2014 (4) TMI 688 - CESTAT MUMBAI

  16. TACO FAURCIA DESIGN CENTER P LTD AND FAURECIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE INDIA P LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE - 2014 (3) TMI 78 - CESTAT MUMBAI

  17. M/s SHYAMALI EXPORTS Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI - 2012 (6) TMI 691 - CESTAT, CHENNAI

 

 

← Previous Next →

 

Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune I Versus Eaton Industries P. Ltd.

 

 

Share:            

| Home | About us | Contact us | Disclaimer | Terms | Privacy |

©Taxmanagementindia.com
A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.
All rights reserved.

Go to Desktop Version