Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + AT Companies Law - 2017 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (4) TMI 477 - AT - Companies LawOppression and Mismanagement by Directors - change in shareholding pattern - maintainability of appeal - Held that:- A shareholder/member or group of shareholder/members without and notice or information cannot visualize or presume that his/their share(s) will be brought down to their disadvantage, which amounts to oppression and mismanagement. On such anticipation or presumption no petition under Sections 397 or 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 can be filed. Such aggrieved shareholder(s)/member(s) can file the petition under Sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 only after cause of action has taken place. If that be so, the day on which a petition under Sections 397 and 398 is filed by a shareholder/member, whose shareholding has been brought down below the requirement of having an aggregate of 10% out of the total shareholding, will be deprived to avail remedy under Section 397 and Section 398, without their fault. For the reasons recorded above, we hold that in the cases where an applicant alleges that his shareholding has been brought down by way of oppression and mismanagement below 1/10th of the total shareholding without notice and knowledge then it is the duty of the Tribunal to determine whether the applicant had 1/10th of the shareholding prior to the date of alleged oppression and mismanagement. Such petition cannot be dismissed on the ground that the applicants shareholding is below 1/10th of the total shareholding of the Company on the actual date of presentation of the Company Petition. It is a different question whether the shareholding was actually brought down by oppression and mismanagement which is to be decided by the Tribunal on the basis of evidence on record. In the present case, the Tribunal failed to apply the aforesaid principle and erred in holding that the Company Petition preferred by the appellants under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 was not maintainable on the date of presentation of the Company Petition. The question of oppression and mismanagement and maintainability in the present case is a mixed question of facts and law. As the petition was filed on the ground that the shareholding of the applicant(s) has been brought down below 1/10th of the total shareholding of a Company by oppression and mismanagement, Tribunal was required to decide the question of maintainability at the time of final hearing of the Petition. Both the merit and question of maintainability were required to be decided together. On hearing the parties, in case the Tribunal forms opinion that there was no oppression and mismanagement on the date of cause of action as alleged by the applicant then in such case it was open to the Tribunal to dismiss the petition as not maintainable in view of Section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956. We set aside the impugned order and judgement passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata and remit the case to the Tribunal for determination of question of maintainability and merit.
|