Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2017 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (9) TMI 998 - AT - Service TaxPenalty - case of appellant is that the assessee’s appeal on the demand has been allowed by the Tribunal which was reported as Inox Air Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad [2015 (1) TMI 460 - CESTAT MUMBAI]. Therefore the present appeal on penalty which is consequent to the demand also deserves to be allowed - Held that: - In the present appeal, the appellant is contesting the penalty related to the same case, which is consequential to the demand. Since the demand case has been decided in favor of the appellant, the present appeal also deserves to be allowed - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
|