Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals News SMS Articles Highlights
        Home        
← Previous Next →
  • Contents
  • Cases Cited

 

User Login
Username  
Password  
Stay sign in     

Forget password        New User/ Regiser

 

2018 (2) TMI 463

Head Note:
CENVAT credit - after availing the benefit of Cenvat credit of duty on the inputs, cleared the inputs as such “as such”, after reversing the credit so availed - Revenue is of the view that such removal of inputs has to be treated as a trading activity so as to make the appellant liable to pay an amount equal to 5%/6% of the value of the goods in terms of the provisions of Rule 6(3) of the CCR 2004 - Held that: - the issue stands covered by the Tribunal decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Ghaziabad Versus Mahaveer Cylinders Ltd. [2016 (11) TMI 1336 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD] laying down that removal of inputs “as such” by a manufacturer cannot be treated to be a trading activity - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.

 


← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 

Let's just recapitulate:

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.