Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2018 (3) TMI Tri This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (3) TMI 231 - Tri - Insolvency and BankruptcyRespondent entitlement to invoke Bank Guarantees during moratorium period - Whether Performance Guarantee is a ‘Security Interest’ or not? - Whether supply of power to Corporate Debtor can be restated? - Held that:- The moratorium imposed is only in respect of the properties of the Corporate Debtor. The moratorium order clearly says that any Security Interest created by the Corporate Debtor cannot be enforced in respect of the property of the Corporate Debtor during the moratorium period. In the case on hand, the moratorium period was extended for further period of 90 days beyond 180 days as per order dated 1st December, 2017. The 180 days’ period had expired on 2.12.2017. Now, it is extended for another period of 90 days. Section 3 (31) clearly says that Performance Guarantees are not included in the Security Interest. What is covered by the order of this Authority under Section 14(l)(c) is the Security Interest. Therefore, the moratorium order passed by this Tribunal is not applicable to the Performance Guarantees given by the Corporate Debtor. Therefore, the Bankers are at liberty to allow the 1st Respondent to encash the Bank Guarantees that are given in respect of Performance Guarantees subject to other objections, if any. The moratorium order passed by this Tribunal applies in respect of Bank Guarantees other than Performance Guarantees furnished by the Corporate Debtor in respect of its property since it comes within the meaning of ‘security interest’. Respondent No. 1 is not entitled to invoke Bank Guarantees other than that comes within the meaning of performance Guarantees, during Moratorium period. Coming to the aspect of disconnection of power supply by the 1st Respondent to the Applicant, it appears that without issuing any notice the power supply was disconnected to the Corporate Debtor. In the case on hand, it appears that the power supply was disconnected to the Corporate Debtor after the declaration of moratorium. Section 14(2) of the Code says, ‘the supply of essential goods or services to the Corporate Debtor shall not be terminated or suspended or interrupted during moratorium period. The supply of power is an essential goods and service with reference to the Corporate Debtor. “Essential Supplies” is defined under Regulation 32 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. Therefore, following the orders passed by this Adjudicating Authority and the interim order dated 15.1.2018 passed by the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) the Respondent No. 1 MGVCL is hereby directed to continue to supply electricity to the Corporate Debtor provided Applicant has cleared all the electricity consumption charges as on the date of disconnection.
|