Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + SC Income Tax - 2018 (4) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (4) TMI 1474 - SC - Income TaxAmount received is in the nature of perquisite or capital receipt - Amount received on redemption of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) - Whether to be treated as capital gains and not perquisite under section 17(2)(iii) of the IT Act or the same is not taxable under the category of capital gains since no consideration had passed from the Respondent - taxability of the perequisite on shares issued to employees at less than market price - Taxable income under the head income from “Salaries” - Held that:- No force in the argument of the Revenue that the case of the Respondent would fall under the ambit of Section 17(2) (iii) of the IT Act instead of Section 17(2) (iiia) of the IT Act. It is a fundamental principle of law that a receipt under the IT Act must be made taxable before it can be treated as income. Courts cannot construe the law in such a way that brings an individual within the ambit of Income Tax Act to pay tax who otherwise is not liable to pay. In the absence of any such specific provision, if an individual is subjected to pay tax, it would amount to the violation of his Constitutional Right. It is apparent that such benefit or perquisite shall have arisen from the business activities or profession whereas in the instant case there is nothing as such. The applicability of Section 28(iv) is confined only to the case where there is any business or profession related transaction involved. Hence, the instant case cannot be covered under Section 28(iv) of the IT Act for the purpose of tax liability. Respondent got the Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) and, eventually received an amount on account of its redemption prior to 01.04.2000 on which the amendment of Finance Act, 1999 (27 of 1999) came into force. In the absence of any express statutory provision regarding the applicability of such amendment from retrospective effect, no force in the argument of the Revenue that such amendment came into force retrospectively. It is well established rule of interpretation that taxing provisions shall be construed strictly so that no person who is otherwise not liable to pay tax, be made liable to pay tax. High Court didn't erred in law while upholding that the amount received on redemption of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) is to be treated as capital gains and not perquisite under section 17(2)(iii) of the IT Act.
|