Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2018 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (8) TMI 952 - AT - Central ExciseCENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - supplementary invoices - Rule 9(1)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - non-inclusion of Royalty charges/Stowing Excise duty, Paryavaran Upkar, Vikas upkar, forest fee, entry tax etc. - suppression of facts or not?. Whether the Appellants are entitled to CENVAT Credit on the basis of supplementary invoices issued by the coal companies and whether the said credit stands denied in terms of Rule 9(1)(b) of the CCR which denies the credit if the supplementary invoices are issued for duties which became payable by the manufacturer on account of willful misstatement or suppression of facts on their part? Held that:- It is an admitted position that demand raised by the department against M/s. SECL is under challenge before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and therefore the Cenvat credit can be availed by the manufacturer on the strength of supplementary invoice since such amount of duty cannot be said to be paid on account of any non-levy or short levy by reason of fraud, collusion or any willful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention of any provision of the Central Excise Act/Rules with intent to evade payment of duty. There cannot be suppression of fact when the issue of liability of payment of Excise duty at the end of the coal companies was a debatable issue which is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Appellant is entitled to take Cenvat Credit on the supplementary invoices in question - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
|