Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (10) TMI 852 - AT - Income TaxEntitled to the benefit of section 10(37) - nature of land - acquisition of the urban agricultural land as a compulsory acquisition - Held that:- The assessee’s 70 cents of land at Vizhinjam Village was notified for compulsory acquisition by Government of Kerala for developing Vizhinjam International Seaport. Though the acquisition proceedings were taken under the Land Acquisition Act, the final price was fixed upon negotiated sale agreement. AO has allowed the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 54B which provides for a deduction on account of transfer of land used for agricultural purpose and for purchase of another agricultural land. Therefore, admittedly, when deduction has been granted u/s 54B A.O. also categorically admitted that the land sold was an agricultural land. A.O., however, noticed that the land was within Trivandrum Municipal Corporation, and therefore, would be an urban agricultural land falling within the provisions of section 2(14)(iii). The only reason for the A.O. to deny the benefit of section 10(37) was that the impugned land was acquired by executing a sale deed in favour of Vizhinjam International Seaport and it was not a case of compulsory acquisition. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Balakrishnan v. Union of India & Others [2017 (3) TMI 745 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] had categorically held merely because the sale price was fixed through a negotiated settlement, the character of acquisition would still remain compulsory. In the instant case, the entire procedure prescribed under the Land Acquisition Act was followed, only price was fixed upon a negotiated settlement. Therefore, in view of the above judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court (supra), we hold that the acquisition of the urban agricultural land was a compulsory acquisition and the same would be entitled to the benefit enumerated in section 10(37) of the I.T.Act. - Decided in favour of assessee.
|