Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (6) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (6) TMI 833 - AT - Insolvency and BankruptcyAdmissibility of petition - initiation of CIRP - Impleadment Application filed by the Appellant was initially rejected and by subsequent order dated 18th March, 2019 the application u/s 7 was admitted - applicant claimed as purchaser of CD property - HELD THAT:- From the decision of Supreme Court in “Innoventive Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank and Ors. [2017 (9) TMI 58 - SUPREME COURT] it is clear that the Adjudicating Authority is required to go through the record to find if there is a debt and default and while doing so it was open for the Corporate Debtor to show that there is no debt payable and no default, at the stage of admission of the petition. Except the Corporate Debtor, no other party has right to intervene at the stage of admission of a petition u/s 7 or 9. However, an aggrieved party may prefer an appeal if the order of admission affects the person. In the present case, we find that the order of admission dated 18th March, 2019 in no manner has cast any impact on the case of the Appellant. It is merely an order of admission of the application under Section 7 against the Corporate Debtor. In view of the provisions of the I&B Code, in case, the Interim Resolution Professional or Resolution Professional wants to take possession of the Hotel namely ‘Hotel Brys Fort, Jaisalmer’, the Appellant may bring facts regarding its claim to the notice of the Interim Resolution Professional/ Resolution Professional. The Interim Resolution Professional/ Resolution Professional will consider it in the light of explanation to Section 18(f) of the I&B Code. Even if, after that the Appellant has some grievance he can move before the Adjudicating Authority under Sub-Section 5 of Section 60 and thereafter, if his grievance is not resolved, he may prefer an appeal under Section 61 before this Appellate Tribunal. The appeal is not maintainable and is dismissed.
|