Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2019 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (7) TMI 777 - AT - CustomsValuation of imported goods - related party transaction - goods imported by M/s. Baxter India Pvt. Ltd. Gurgaon from their related suppliers M/s. Baxter USA and associated companies - Sub-Rule 3 (3) (a) of Rule 3 CVR for Determination of Value Rules ignored and jumping upon Rule 3 (3) (b) thereof - HELD THAT:- In case of import by any person from an overseas “related party” the valuation of goods for the purpose of assessment of Customs duty is examined by Special Valuation Branch (SVB) in Custom House to find out the influence of relationship on import valuation and whether any addition in import value is required to bring it at par with third party independent prices, as is apparent from Rule 3 of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. The admitted fact of the present case is that the import of the appellant since the year 2002 has regularly been examined by SVB after every expiry of 3 years and based upon the declaration to the effect that there is no change in the terms of the agreement with the foreign related party, mode of invoicing etc. the said SVB’s order is being successively reviewed after every 3 years since 2002 till 2015. From Rule 3 it is apparent that where the buyer and seller are related, transaction value is acceptable for the customs purposes under the provisions of Rule 3 (3) (a) - rule 3 (3) (a) provides that where the buyer and seller are related, the transaction value shall be accepted provided that the examination of the circumstances of the sale of the imported goods indicate that the relationship did not influence the price. It is not intended that there should be an examination of the circumstances in all cases where the buyer and the seller are related. In this case the valuation of goods imported by M/s. Baxter from the related Companies has been examined number of times since 2002 and it was found that the relationship has not influenced the price, hence the declared value will be accepted under Rule 3 (3) (a). The examination of valuation of goods under subsequent Rules (4) to (9) is not applicable. Rule 3 (3) (a) & 3 (3) (b) provide different means of establishing the acceptability of a transaction value - Rule 3 (3) (b) cannot be made applicable while deciding the transaction value in the present case - There is nothing on record nor even a finding that the relationship of importer and exporter has influenced the price. Thus, jumping to Rule 3 (3) (b) was not at all relevant. We are of the opinion that order to that extent is not sustainable. Commissioner (Appeals) has committed an error, while ignoring Sub-Rule 3 (3) (a) of Rule 3 CVR for Determination of Value Rules and while jumping upon Rule 3 (3) (b) thereof - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.
|