Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1984 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1984 (9) TMI 131 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
- Dispute over valuation of gifted land for tax assessment under Gift-tax Act, 1958
- Determination of whether the gift was made for the education of the donee
- Assessment of exemption under section 5(1)(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the valuation of a gifted land for tax assessment under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The assessee had gifted a plot of land to her son for educational purposes, which was later sold by the donee. The Gift Tax Officer (GTO) estimated the value of the gifted land at Rs. 30,000 and denied the exemption claimed by the assessee under section 5(1)(xii) of the Act. The GTO treated the balance amount after basic exemption as a taxable gift.

The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), who considered the purpose of the gift as stated in the registered deed and estimated the education expenses of the donee. The AAC allowed an exemption for a portion of the gift amount, providing relief to the assessee. However, the revenue challenged the AAC's decision, arguing that the value of the gifted land should not have been reduced, and the exemption under section 5(1)(xii) was wrongly granted.

In the appellate proceedings, the counsel for the assessee contended that the GTO's valuation was unjustified and cited a judgment of the Kerala High Court to support the claim for exemption. The counsel argued that the AAC's decision was fair and reasonable, considering the circumstances of the case.

Upon careful consideration, the Appellate Tribunal held that the value of the gifted property determined by the AAC was reasonable and upheld the exemption under section 5(1)(xii). The Tribunal emphasized that since the corpus of the property was being taxed, the income derived from the property was irrelevant for determining the exemption eligibility. The Tribunal confirmed the AAC's order, rejecting the revenue's appeal and providing relief to the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates