Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

sales return under rule 16 central excise, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 109649
Dated: 4-1-2016
By:- Anil Jangid

sales return under rule 16 central excise


  • Contents

Sales return under rule 16 of central excise,is it necessary to submit intimation to central excise dept for goods return due to quality problem or party not accept the material.

Some commissionerate issue trade notice and make rule submit intimation.

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 4-1-2016
By:- Rajagopalan Ranganathan

Sir,

Sub-rule (1) and (2) of rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 state as follows: -

(1) Where any goods on which duty had been paid at the time of removal thereof are brought to any factory for being re-made, refined, re-conditioned or for any other reason, the assessee shall state the particulars of such receipt in his records and shall be entitled to take CENVAT credit of the duty paid as if such goods are received as inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and utilise this credit according to the said rules.

(2) If the process to which the goods are subjected before being removed does not amount to manufacture, the manufacturer shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken under sub-rule (1) and in any other case the manufacturer shall pay duty on goods received under sub-rule (1) at the rate applicable on the date of removal and on the value determined under sub-section (2) of section 3 or section 4 or section 4A of the Act, as the case may be.

Explanation: The amount paid under this sub-rule shall be allowed as CENVAT credit as if it was a duty paid by a manufacturer who removes the goods.

In view of the above you are required to maintain proper account for receipt and disposal of the returned goods on the grounds of being re-made, refined, re-conditioned or for any other reason. Therefore it is clear that you need not send any intimation regarding receipt of the returned goods. If any trade notice is issued by the Commissioners it is clearly ultra vires of the rules and you need not comply with such notice. However if you are not in a position to comply with sub-rule (1) and (2) then as per sub-rule (3) if there is any difficulty in following the provisions of sub-rule (1) and sub-rule (2), the assessee may receive the goods for being re-made, refined, re-conditioned or for any other reason and may remove the goods subsequently subject to such conditions as may be specified by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as the case may be. I feel the trade notice mentioned by you should have been issued under sub-rule (3).


2 Dated: 4-1-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Rajagopalan Ranganathan Ji,

Sir. I endorse your views. In some commissionerates old practice of giving intimation is going on . Assessees file intimation with the jurisdictional Range Officer with an intent that nothing is lost if they intimate otherwise it is not requirement of Central Excise law, as explained by you in detail.


3 Dated: 5-1-2016
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

In Rule 16 there is no mention of this aspect. Hence, no need to comply.


4 Dated: 5-1-2016
By:- MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN

I endorse the views of Shri Rajagopalan Sir who discussed the case very elaborately.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates