Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...

Category of Documents

Latest Case Laws

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals SMS News Articles
D. Forum
What's New


Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

← Previous Next →

Refund U/s 11B of CEA, 1944, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 113163
Dated: 8-12-2017
Refund U/s 11B of CEA, 1944

  • Contents

Dear All,

As we are aware that refund U/s 11B of CEA,1944 is available within one year. The same is also applicable for refund under Rule 5 of CCR'2004.

In this regard I want to know that a company have filed a refund claim where CEx duty was paid on delay submission of proof of export, on export to SEZ unit.

The refund claim was filed after the lapse of 2 years from the date of payment of CEx duty.

We know that Section 11B not permitting this but when the company has paid the CEx duty, they wrote in the letter that duty was provisionally paid due to non submission of proof of export within the time prescribed.

Now I want to know can I take the interpretation that provisionally paid and paid under protest is same in this context.

As duty is eligible to the company but they where delayed in filing the refund claim.

Kindly let me know is it possible to take the stand that provisionally paid is meant as paid under protest. If any case law is there kindly let me know.


Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 1 of 1 Records

1 Dated: 13-5-2018

Whether the final assessement is made in this case?


Old Query - New Comments are closed.

← Previous Next →

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Blog || Site Map - Recent || Site Map ||