2008 (2) TMI 584

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e and Y.R. Mishra i/by M.H. Patil, for the Respondent. [Order]. - P.C. : Review Petition (L) No. 47 of 2007 has filed in Civil Writ Petition No. 3169 of 2004 while Review Petition (L) No. 48 of 2007 has been filed in Civil Writ Petition No. 1110 of 2004. It is not necessary for us to go into the factual matrix of the matter. Suffice it to note that the Division Bench of this Court passed both the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2004 is concerned, it is not necessary for this Court to recall the order, as it merely orders grant of hearing to the petitioner in that petition. Since the matter cannot be argued before that authority, the order is redundant, ineffective and, therefore, is recalled and that writ petition would stand dismissed. As far as Writ Petition No. 1110 of 2004 is concerned, for the reasons aforestated, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X