2002 (12) TMI 476

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt. [Order per : Krishna Kumar, Member (J)]. - Arguing the case for the applicants the learned Advocate Shri J.C. Patel, submitted that the applicants are engaged in the manufacture of Containers made of papers falling under sub-heading 4819.12 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 which were chargeable to Central Excise duty at the rate of 35% ad valorem at the relevant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Composite Containers under the Small Scale General Exemption Notification 175/86 read with Tariff Notification 67/82 which provided effective rate of 15% ad valorem and reduction of 10% ad valorem. 2. The learned Counsel has drawn our attention to the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) at page 52 wherein the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has observed that the appellants manufacture Com .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ontended that the applicants have got a prima facie strong case in their favour for waiver of entire demand of duty. 3. Shri M.H. Sheikh, learned JDR appearing on behalf of the Revenue contended that it is the base paper for the manufacture of the Composite Containers which entitled the applicants to avail the benefit of the notification in question. Since the applicants have used LDPE coate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X