2002 (12) TMI 480

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - This condonation of delay application has been filed by the Revenue for delay in filing the appeal filed by it. There is a delay of four months in filing the present appeal for which the condonation of delay application is sought. On the last date of hearing, learned S.D.R. was directed to obtain a clarification for each day's delay. F .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... peals) was accepted because there was no loss of revenue involved as per the comment of Superintendent (Tech.). But the product should have been correctly classified under 3801.00 Heading and not 8485.90. 28-6-2002 Commissioner called for the file and ordered for preferring appeal before CEGAT in view of apparent mis-classification of the product. 3-7-2002 Draft Appeal petition alongwith COD a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X