TMI Blog2008 (7) TMI 686X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n, R. Raghavan and M. Kannan, Counsels, for the Appellant. Smt. R. Bhagya Devi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. These matters are arising for report of compliance. It is submitted by the counsel for appellants in Appeal Nos. C/52, 53, 63, 85 and 86/2008 that they have obtained from the Hon ble High Court stay of operation of our Stay Order dated 30-4-2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... this extent. It is submitted by the counsel for the appellants in Appeal No. C/87/2008 that the amount of duty (Rs. 5,72,984/-) paid by them during the course of investigations is more than the amount of penalty imposed on them by the Commissioner. It is submitted that, according to the prima facie view taken by this Bench, the extended period of limitation is not applicable for recovery of duty ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
