1981 (1) TMI 264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e revision application and submissions made at the time of personal hearing. 2. The facts of the case are that the petitioners are engaged in the manufacture of carburettors. They claimed assessment of the carburettors under Item 34A Central Excise Tariff as motor vehicle parts. At the material time Item 34A covered "Parts of motor vehicles not otherwise specified". The Asstt. Collector did .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eing manufactured to the requirement of various manufacturers, like, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Scooters India Ltd., Punjab Scooters Ltd. etc., for use in motor vehicles. They advertised their goods as used in different makes of scooters and mopeds. Their industrial licence was obtained for the purpose of manufacture of "Carburettors for scooters, motor cycles, moped etc.".: He relied upon the certificate g .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ey would not claim refund of the duty paid thereon in respect of these clearances where the buyers have claimed set off/proforma credit of the duty. 5. Government find considerable force in the petitioners contention that the carburettors manufactured by them are motor vehicles parts. Government accordingly hold that for the material period i.e. before Tariff Item 34A was amended in 1979 the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X