Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. STADS Ltd.

Transfer to the General Reserve on amalgamation - whether is not in the nature of any benefit or perquisite and thus not taxable under Section 28(iv) - Held that:- A plain reading of the provision of Section 28(iv) makes it clear that the amount reflected in the balance sheet of the assessee under the head 'reserves and surplus' cannot be treated as a benefit or perquisite arising from business or exercise of profession. The difference amount post amalgamation was the amalgamation reserve and it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uisite and thus not taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Decided against revenue. - Tax Case (Appeal) No.118 of 2015 - Dated:- 11-3-2015 - R.Sudhakar And R.Karuppiah JJ. For the Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Standing Counsel For the Respondent : None. Judgment (Delivered by R.SUDHAKAR, J.) This Tax Case (Appeal) is filed by the Revenue as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal raising the following substantial question of law: "Whether in the facts and cir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

echnologies Ltd., M/s.Web-net Technologies Ltd., M/s.Linus and M/s.Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd., had amalgamated with the assessee company and a sum of ₹ 2,16,88,220/- had been reflected as reserves and surplus in the balance sheet. The assessee company filed its return of income for the assessment year 2003-04 on 01.12.2003. Since the assessee did not respond to the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, field enquiries were conducted and based on the report rec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the findings of the AO, the remand report and also the submissions made by the AR of the appellant and also the judicial pronouncements cited by the AR of the appellant on this issue. I have also perused the order of the High Court of Madras dated 10.3.2003 approving the scheme of amalgamation of the three transferor companies viz., M/s. I.Trigger Technologies (P) Ltd., M/s.Web Technologies (P) Ltd., Linus Solutions (P) Ltd. with transferee comapny viz., M/s.System Telecom and Data Services (P) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s the amalgamation reserve. From the above facts and circumstances of the case, I find that the nature of the receipt ie., amalgamation reserve is not on account of any normal business transaction or revenue transactions. The nature of the receipt is a capital receipt which arose on account of the amalgamation of the companies. The ratio of the decision rendered by ITAT, Calcutta Bench, cited by the AR of the appellant in the case of ITO v. Shreyans Investments (P) Ltd. in IT Appeal No.1485(Kol) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d the matter before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, by a brief order, confirmed the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 5. As against the said order of the Tribunal, the Revenue once again pursued the matter before this Court by filing the present appeal. 6. Heard Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant and perused the materials placed before this Court. 7. It is seen that by order dated 10.3.2003, this Court approved the scheme of amalgamation of three tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

companies before amalgamation was ₹ 3,04,48,600/- and equity share capital of the company post amalgamation was ₹ 87,60,380/- and the difference was ₹ 2,16,88,220/-. The assessee showed the said difference under the category "reserves and surplus" in the balance sheet. 8. The Department took a view that it is a profit and gains or profession, more particularly it is a value of benefit or perquisite arising from business or exercise of profession. But the Commissioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version